- Wed, Jul 20, 2011
- Prolife
Does the pregnancy rate of women on the pill prove that it doesn’t prevent implantation?
Pregnancy rates do not prove that the pill does not prevent implantation.
Pregnancy rates do not prove that the pill does not prevent implantation.
TNL Productions: A Christian worker, his family and a nurse friend investigate throughout North America to uncover the truth about the birth control pill.
The following is a conversation between two Christians who have different viewpoints on the issue of birth control. (I’ve made up the dialogue, but much of it comes out of discussions we’ve had in the Bible college ethics courses I’ve taught.) Think about the points they make. You will likely agree and disagree with both of them at different times. Hopefully this will help you develop and clarify your own position, which may combine elements of both or be very different from either.
Tri-Phasil is, like all of the combination oral contraceptive pills, effective through three mechanisms of action.
The director of education at the Crisis Pregnancy Center I volunteer at was recently somewhere listening to a Pro-Life contraceptive expert who was telling them about Seasonale, a new birth control pill that supposedly doesn't change the lining of a woman's uterus. I asked my OB's nurse about it and go the impression that it works no differently than the current BC pills, only you have a period 4x a year. I was wondering if you have done any research on this Pill, and if so, what have you found about it? Is it an abortifacient? Or is it safe?
Like the Pill it also functions to prevent or end a pregnancy in three ways.
Review of "Does the Birth Control Pill Cause Abortions? by Jed Stuber
Amidst an ongoing debate among prolife advocates about whether to classify the Pill as an abortifacient or a prophylactic, pro-abortion advocates have published an authoritative statement declaring that the Pill prevents implantation of embryos, thereby causing an abortion.