How Do Seventh Day Adventist (SDA) Beliefs Differ from Evangelical Christian Beliefs?
Question from a reader:
How do Seventh Day Adventist (SDA) beliefs differ from evangelical Christian beliefs?
Answer from Randy Alcorn:
Here are some online resources about various aspects of Seventh Day Adventist beliefs, specifically Sabbath-keeping, the New Covenant, and doctrine:
- Best concise article giving the two major evangelical viewpoints.
- This is a good scholarly attempt by an SDA theologian to defend their position on the Sabbath. Note the section later in the paper where he asks if Sabbath keeping is part of the New Covenant. Though I disagree with his logic, he makes what would be a persuasive case for those from SDA backgrounds. I appreciate that the author isn’t trying to be legalistic in his approach; he just genuinely believes the Sabbath was never superseded or fulfilled, and is still obligatory for God’s people.
- This “Sabbath is no longer in force” position has some good biblical points, and good answers to SDA arguments, though there are some eccentricities.
- This article is written by an evangelical Presbyterian pastor, who is balanced and cautious in his treatment, but believes Adventists can be true Christians (I believe the same), yet there remain seriously problematic beliefs taught in their churches (I believe that too).
- This small book and its treatment of the New Covenant are particularly interesting, as the author is a former SDA, and it explains why he left.
- This paper adds some great insights not in any of the above.
- This article is mostly critical of the SDA doctrine and considers it not be based on the Bible.
- In contrast, you have the weird SDA teaching that those who worship on Sunday will be the ones with the mark of the beast, as in this article. Yet I find it hard to believe that Adventists I know who clearly regard me as a fellow believer, and who give away my books at their churches really think I will have the mark of the beast.
From my perspective, parts of the SDA church have experienced the equivalent of a reformation, and parts have held on tenaciously to the heritage of Ellen G. White, and a number fall in between. Those who talk most about White tend to talk least, in my opinion, about the true Jesus and sound biblical doctrine.
White taught that Jesus was really the archangel Michael, an obvious heresy though some say she didn’t necessarily deny his deity in doing so, though that’s pretty hard to grasp. Furthermore, she introduced many weird beliefs. After SDA founder William Miller declared Christ would return in 1844, prophetess Ellen White covered up this failure by saying Jesus entered the Holy of Holies in 1844, and stated that it was essential that people believe this doctrine in order to be saved. Yikes! She also fostered much of the legalism surrounding Sabbath-keeping.
However, I think to many Christ-following Adventists, Ellen G. White is a bit of an embarrassment from the early days of the movement, and they don’t talk much about her, and quietly feel like the church has moved beyond her heresies and idiosyncrasies. However, if you were to come right out and say that, I think your future in the SDA church would be short!
Here is a very positive piece on Ellen G. White, trying to prove she was an evangelical. The quotations are highly selective. I don’t dismiss them; I just feel that they should be stacked up against her many false teachings. But it has value in balancing the other stuff which is mostly negative.
More balance is offered in this article by Roger Olson, an Arminian theologian who I often disagree with, but who is an evangelical. In spending a lot of time with Adventists, he is convinced many of them are evangelicals also.
If you want more there is this article. Of greatest interest to me here is the beginning where Walter Martin is quoted, and then at the end there’s a quote from Ron Carlson (a great brother who I knew well, now with Jesus). Martin included SDAs in his classic Kingdom of the Cults, but met with many SDA leaders and saw them correcting many of the more cultic aspects of the church. He then decided (as the beginning of the article points out) that they had an orthodox view of Jesus and therefore shouldn’t be considered a cult. Ron Carlson, who was very close to Walter Martin, pointed out that many of the SDA pastors who became increasingly evangelical were “kicked out” of the church by denominational leaders trying to steer them back to the eccentricities and some heresies espoused by Ellen G. White.
In my experience, I believe there are many SDAs who are genuine followers of Christ, just as there are many people at more solidly evangelical churches who are not. Many still consider SDAs a cult, understandable due to Ellen G. White shaping the group in similar fashion to the founders of the Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons. But there are very major differences. The Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons categorically get it wrong about Jesus. Ellen G. White said much about Jesus that was true, and other SDA leaders have unapologetically affirmed the trinity and the deity of Christ. There are some SDAs who are old school, more in the tradition of White, but I think many of them today see Him as true God, God’s Son, Savior, and believe in justification by grace through faith.